Studi Komparasi Prosedur Rinoplasti Dari Aspek Bedah Dan Non-Bedah: Efektivitas Dan Komplikasi

Authors

  • Tri Yunita Alicia Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Aurora Rahyu Pasya Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Gina Lestari Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Shania Latiza Muluk Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Leany Leany Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia, Indonesia

Keywords:

Rhinoplasty, Surgical Rhinoplasty, Non-Surgical Rhinoplasty

Abstract

Today, the proportion and symmetry of facial features are considered as determinants of the perception of beauty, including the nose. Rhinoplasty is a procedure that aims to reshape the contour of the nose which is done with cosmetic indications or improvement of clinical problems. According to a survey conducted by the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ISAPS), rhinoplasty is one of the top five most popular aesthetic procedures globally. From the patient's perspective, the end result of the procedure is a fundamental issue in rhinoplasty practice, not only to address functional indications but also aesthetic aspects, as well as the overall impact of carrying out this procedure. Aims: The author wishes to compile an integrated literature review regarding definitions, working procedures, advantages and disadvantages including complications of each procedure in order to provide the latest reference regarding comparison of surgical and non-surgical rhinoplasty as a basis for consideration in selecting an action. Methods: A literature search was conducted through databases such as PubMed and Science Direct with the keywords “rhinoplasty”, “surgical rhinoplasty”, and “non-surgical rhinoplasty”. Other studies that did not address the appropriate population and sample were excluded. Results: Surgical rhinoplasty provides permanent results and can be performed in conjunction with other procedures so as to meet efficiency aspects, however, long recovery time, quite complicated risks, and high costs must be considered. Whereas non-surgical rhinoplasty has a short duration of action, faster recovery time, lower costs, but requires more intensive treatment because the results are reversible. Several complications can also accompany this procedure, such as occlusion of blood vessels. Conclusions: Between the two options, it cannot be definitively decided which procedure is superior because both procedures have indications, benefits, and complications that may affect each candidate subjectively. Thus, a comprehensive interview is required regarding the history of the condition, expected results, possible risks and complications, as well as the sociodemographic history and financial status of each candidate before a decision on the selection of the procedure is made.

Author Biographies

Tri Yunita Alicia, Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia

Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia

Aurora Rahyu Pasya, Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia

Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia

Gina Lestari, Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia

Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia

Shania Latiza Muluk, Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia

Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia

Leany Leany, Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia

Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia

Published

2023-06-05

How to Cite

Alicia, T. Y., Pasya, A. R., Lestari, G., Muluk, S. L., & Leany, L. (2023). Studi Komparasi Prosedur Rinoplasti Dari Aspek Bedah Dan Non-Bedah: Efektivitas Dan Komplikasi . Health Information : Jurnal Penelitian, 15(1). Retrieved from https://myjurnal.poltekkes-kdi.ac.id/index.php/hijp/article/view/865

Issue

Section

Journal Supplement

Citation Check

Most read articles by the same author(s)